
Funnily enough, there was an article in “TheTimes” yesterday, about the opposite situation to the lady mentioned in my last post. In this case, a woman won a payment of £220,000 in a divorce settlement, 22 years after separating from her husband.
The divorce proceedings were initiated after the woman discovered about her husband’s inheritance. She says that she did not want to put their son through the messiness of a divorce when he was younger, but also that the change in her husband’s finances had been a catalyst for her action.
He inherited £120,000, invested it in property which he sold last year for £1.1 million.
At first, it seems unfair and that the woman was simply cashing in. Why should he have to pay something to her, so many years later?
Reading the story more closely, you realize that she had brought up a son, alone and had received little maintenance from this man. He was left with a substantial share of the capital after all, and she was reimbursed for her years of struggle. In fact her lawyers point out that the settlement had to be just to the husband also.
H
owever, it does seem to be risky to drift along in the legal limbo of separation without divorce, since at any time life could throw a curved ball of some sort and then the legal process to sort everything out will be that much more complicated and of course expensive.
WomansDivorce.com is a helpful site for US women thinking of divorce. The situation in the UK seems a bit different, as an inheritance that is received before divorce is likely to be taken into account in sharing out the couple’s assets. See wikidivorce.com for the Uk version of events.

